\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \nLearn more about The Mass Readings Explained \u0026gt;\n \nTranscript:\n So let’s being with Mark 7:1 and following:\n\nNow when the Pharisees gathered together to him, with some of the scribes, who had come from Jerusalem, they saw that some of his disciples ate with hands defiled, that is, unwashed. (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they wash their hands, observing the tradition of the elders; and when they come from the market place, they do not eat unless they purify themselves; and there are many other traditions which they observe, the washing of cups and pots and vessels of bronze.) And the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, "Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with hands defiled?" And he said to them, "Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written, `This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’ You leave the commandment of God, and hold fast the tradition of men.” And he said to them, "You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God, in order to keep your tradition! For Moses said, `Honor your father and your mother'; and, `He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him surely die'; but you say, `If a man tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is Corban' (that is, given to God) -- then you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or mother, thus making void the word of God through your tradition which you hand on. And many such things you do.” And he called the people to him again, and said to them, "Hear me, all of you, and understand: there is nothing outside a man which by going into him can defile him; but the things which come out of a man are what defile him.” And when he had entered the house, and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. And he said to them, "Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him, since it enters, not his heart but his stomach, and so passes on?" (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, "What comes out of a man is what defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, fornication, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a man."\n\n\nAlright, so that’s the end of the gospel. Okay, there’s a lot going on there, that’s a long gospel. So it’s another example of the fact that although Mark has fewer episodes in his gospel, when he gives episodes that occur in Matthew and Luke he frequently gives more detail, they’re longer. So this same episode occurs in Matthew 15 but it's much more brief. So let's walk through it together in detail. \nFirst, the Pharisees’ hand-washing. The story begins here with a conflict over the fact that the disciples aren’t washing their hands before they eat their meals. Now this isn't just a question of hygiene, right, there is something more going on here and Mark, unlike Matthew, cues you into what that is. So when Matthew mentions the hand-washing in his gospel, he leaves it unexplained because he's writing for a Jewish audience, he's writing for a Jewish Christian audience who would be familiar with the Pharisaic custom of hand-washing. But Mark, who in all likelihood is writing for Christians in Rome, probably predominantly a Gentile audience, has to stop and explain this custom to his audience with a kind of aside to make sure they understand what's going on. So what he says here is that the Pharisees and the Jews don't eat unless they wash their hands in observance of “the tradition of the elders,” right. So the Greek word here for tradition is paradosis, it literally means something handed on, right. And in this case the tradition of the elders meant a tradition of the Pharisaic elders. \nSo who are the Pharisees? They were a sect within Judaism, they were a group within Judaism that made one of their goals to live according to the holiness of the Temple in their daily lives. So think about it for just a minute, if you go back to the Old Testament, there are laws of ritual washings that you would have to follow if you were going to go into the Temple in order to worship. Numbers 9, for example, talks about some of these ritual washings. Jews before they would go into the Temple would wash in a bath called a Mikveh. They would go down into the water, they would cleanse themselves, and then they would enter into the Temple to celebrate Passover or one of the feasts or offer sacrifice. What the Pharisees did was different. They not only practiced the washings before entering into God's presence in the Temple, they, in a sense, brought the holiness into the Temple into all of their daily life so that before they would even eat a meal they would wash their hands in a ritual act of purification. Now the Bible nowhere commands such an act, right, it’s not in the Jewish Scriptures, but it was part of the tradition of the elders of the Pharisaic sect, of that sect of Judaism. Now the Pharisaic sect was the most popular Jewish movement in the First Century A.D. There were other Jewish movements like the Sadducees and the Essenes, that are tied to the Dead Sea Scrolls, but the majority of Jewish people, if they followed anyone of these groups at all, followed the ways of the Pharisees, okay. They were very prominent in the synagogues throughout the holy land. So what Mark is doing is just letting you know that what’s happening here is most Jewish people follow the Pharisees’ practice of washing hands but the Pharisees here notice that Jesus' disciples aren’t doing it, right, they’re not keeping that custom. So they're offended by it and they’re kind of scandalized by it and they ask him a question, "Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with hands defiled [meaning unwashed]?”\nJesus fires right back at them with a quote from the Book of Isaiah. He says to them that Isaiah spoke about you hypocrites and he basically condemned in advance, he spoke prophetically, about these Pharisees. He says, in the Book of Isaiah that, “the people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain they worship me, teaching as doctrine things that are just the precepts of men.” Okay, so what is that talking about? Well here Jesus is setting up a contrast between doctrine, in Greek didaskalia, meaning teaching that comes directly from God, and the precepts of men, the Greek word there is entalma, but the important point is it's a precept of men, in other words, things that just originate with human authority and not with God's authority. Then Jesus says something so important here. He says, “you leave the commandment of God and hold fast to the tradition of men.” Okay, what is going on there, what's he talking about? In isolation it can sound like he is condemning all tradition, but that’s not what he’s doing. The key line there is you abandon the commandment of God for the tradition of men. In other words, you're coming up with traditions that not only supplement the word of God but actually undercut the word of God and make it where you don't have to follow the word of God. \nJesus gives an example, it’s the example of Corban. What was Corban? Corban was an Aramaic word that means dedicated to God, and what some Pharisees were doing is they were taking property and possessions and they were declaring it dedicated to God, consecrated to the Temple. In other words, they would set these things apart for the Temple in order to get out of having to use that money or use those possessions to support their own parents, okay. So it was a way of basically avoiding of having to take care of your parents in their old age or provide for their means. So Jesus here sets it up, he says Moses told you to honor your father and mother but some of you are taking money that you should be using to take care of your aging parents and you're calling it holy and dedicated to the Temple (i.e. Corban). What does he say then? You use this tradition of men to avoid keeping the commandment of God and he says, and you do many such things. So that's the key there. What he's saying here is, he’s giving us a window into the fact that there were some Pharisees in the First Century A.D. who are using some of these traditions, like the Corban tradition, to avoid keeping the commandments like honor your father and mother, it’s the fourth commandment which came directly from God, through Moses, to the people of Israel. It's written with the finger of God in Exodus 31. So Jesus’ point in context here is not, and this is really important, it's not that all traditions are bad, it's that human traditions that undercut or contradict the word of God have no place in the people of God, and that's what some of these Pharisees have developed, these human traditions that are used to avoid keeping the commandments. \nAlright, so once that example is in place now Jesus calls the disciples to them and he gives them a riddle. He says listen to me, there's nothing outside of a man that by going in can defile him, but it’s what comes out of a man is what defiles him. Now, Jesus gives the disciples an example, because he pulls them aside and he says let me explain what this means to you, and he uses it and he applies it to the issue of unclean foods. He's trying to help them see that it's not whatever food you eat, whether you are eating with washed hands or unwashed hands, that's not what actually defiles a person; it's not what goes into him because it just passes through the body. What actually defiles a person is what comes out of the heart. It's sin that defiles a person in the final analysis, and in that verse Mark has another aside, he says, thus he declared all foods clean. We’re going to see this play out in the early church that one of the big divergences between the early church and those Jews who continue to follow the Mosaic law is over the question of clean and unclean foods. You’ll get into that in the Book of Acts when Peter has the vision and God reveals to him that all foods have been made clean and all peoples have been made clean. But Jesus is already planting the seed, so to speak, of that teaching in this passage in Mark. \nIn any case, Jesus ends the teaching with a very important statement — this is kind of the climax — when he says from within, out of the heart of man, come all these evil things. Alright, so what’s he getting at here? What Jesus is showing here is the primacy or the priority of moral defilement over physical defilement, or even ritual defilement, the cultic defilement of ritual cleansing entering into the Temple. What he's saying is what ultimately matters is the interior defilement that comes from the wickedness of the human heart. You'll see this elsewhere in the gospels where Jesus will lambaste the Pharisees because some of them are acting in a hypocritical way. They're paying their tithes, they're making sure they wash their hands, but inside they’re full of dead man's bones and they're doing unclean things like committing adultery or breaking the Ten Commandments. So it doesn't make sense to break the 10 Commandments given directly by God but keep the tradition of the elders of washing your hands before you eat. That ends up making you a hypocrite, right, because you're doing the external gestures of piety and fidelity to God but you're failing on the essentials of obeying the Decalogue, obeying the Ten Commandments.\nNow, the question this immediately is going to raise for a lot of Catholics is, wait, well is Jesus here laying out some kind of principle of sola scriptura, where we should go by the Bible alone and not by any tradition at all? Is Jesus condemning all tradition or just some traditions? And if so, which traditions is he condemning and which is he approving? Now it would take us a really long time to lay out a full exposition of the relationship between Scripture and Tradition here, but just a couple of elements here to help you answer the question in a brief way. Number one, we know from context that Jesus is not condemning all tradition because he himself elsewhere in the gospels commands his disciples to keep certain traditions. So for example in Matthew 23, I think this probably is the most helpful passage, in Matthew 23:1 Jesus says to the disciples:\nThe scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat; so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice.\nSo for example, Jesus commands, in this case this is striking, he tells the disciples to follow the teachings of the Pharisees and scribes when they sit on Moses' seat. That means when they speak authoritatively from Moses, when they teach and interpret the Torah of Moses, but don't do what they do because they preach but they don’t practice. So don’t be hypocrites like them. So Jesus has a respect for Jewish tradition. He himself is going to follow it when they go down to the Temple to celebrate the Passover, for example, and he celebrates Passover with a glass of wine, right, a cup of wine. There's no mention of wine in the Old Testament for celebrating the Passover, it was part of Jewish tradition, but Jesus keeps that. So there are certain traditions that he exhorts the apostles to keep, but there are other traditions that undermine the commandments of God, like the Corban tradition, and those he says he rejects. Or other traditions which, like the washing of hands, which are neither here nor there, they don't matter at the end of the day because they don't get to the heart of the matter. Scholars use the word adiafora for that, they are incidentals, you can give them or you can take them, you can take them or leave them. Paul will say this in his letters to Romans for example. \nBut then there are certain traditions which are binding. And so again we interpret, whenever we look at a passage in the Bible, we interpret it in context and in 2 Thessalonians 2:15, Paul says to the Christians, “stand firm and hold fast to the traditions,” paradosis, same word Jesus uses, “which you have heard from us, whether by word of mouth or by letter.” So St. Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, elsewhere in the New Testament says we actually do have to keep the traditions, whether they’re written or they’re oral, as long as they’re from the apostles. So apostolic tradition has to be kept. So in essence, what's going on here is we need to make the distinction between a tradition of men which contradicts the word of God, Jesus condemns that, and an apostolic tradition which is guided by the Holy Spirit and given to the church as binding, whether in written or oral form. Those traditions we have to keep, right. Now you might think okay, well, how am I supposed to know which traditions are apostolic and which ones are man-made? Which ones are permanent and binding and which ones can be changed, or can be dispensed with? Well you know that by the living authority of the church herself. The reason Christ institutes a church with leaders like the apostles, Peter and James and John, is so that the living authorities, the apostles and their successors, can discern through the Holy Spirit what elements of Sacred Tradition are permanent and binding and what aspects of Christian life and worship are customs, or little “T” traditions, that can come and go. \nSo the best statement I know of this is from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. If you have the Catechism you can look at paragraph 83, a nice distinction, I’ll quote it now:\nAnd [Holy] Tradition transmits in its entirety the Word of God which has been entrusted to the apostles by Christ the Lord and the Holy Spirit... Tradition is to be distinguished from the various theological, disciplinary, liturgical, or devotional traditions, born in the local churches over time. These are the particular forms, adapted to different places and times, in which the great Tradition is expressed. In the light of Tradition, these traditions can be retained, modified or even abandoned under the guidance of the Church’s magisterium.\nMagisterium there refers to the teaching authority of the apostles which they have from Christ. So as Catholics, in closing, we believe that there are two kinds of tradition. Big “T” Tradition, apostolic Tradition, and little “T” traditions, customs and disciplines, that arise in various churches over time. The living authority of the church is the one who helps us to discern which are permanent and unchangeable and which are in fact dispensable over time. So I hope that helps you get a little bit of a grasp on what Jesus has to say to us about human tradition.