SECOND READING TRANSCRIPT (Subscribe or Login for Full Transcript):
So first he asserts his identity as a steward of the mystery of God. But then he goes on to defend himself basically and say, “Look, it doesn’t really matter to me if I’m being judged…
...by you or by any human court. I do not even judge myself.
And then Paul says something very interesting. He says here:
I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted.
Now this is a very important point on two counts. First, it’s a very Jewish thing for Paul to say this, for him to look at this own conscience, to look at his own life and say, “I don’t see any cause, any sin in my life that gives you grounds for judging me. However, that doesn't mean that I’m acquitted.” And the reason that he would say that is because in the Jewish Scriptures—in the Psalter, in particular, the book of Psalms—it’s very clear that of course there are sins that we can commit with full knowledge and deliberate consent. “Over the high hand” is the language you’ll sometimes see. But there are also hidden sins. In other words, things that we do that violate love of God or love of neighbor, but which we ourselves are not aware of. For example, if you look at Psalm 19:12, it says this:
...who can discern his errors?
And then the Psalmist says to God:
Clear thou me from hidden faults.
In other words, in Psalm 19, the Psalmist is praying to God, asking for the grace to avoid flagrant sin. But he also says, “I want you to cleanse me from all sin, even those hidden faults that I’m not even aware of.” Because what human being can be aware of every single fault and every single error that they have? So Paul here kind of reflects that Jewish idea that I’m not even aware myself of all of my sins, so I don’t judge myself.
The second thing that’s interesting about that verse is the translation here. So Paul says:
I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted.
Now that’s an interesting translation of the verb, because the verb in Greek here is
dikaioō. It ordinarily when Paul used it—in fact, almost every time Paul uses this term, it ordinarly gets translated as “justified.”
Dikaioō is to make righteous or to declare righteous. This is the famous verb that has become the center of so much debate since the time of the Protestant Reformation. How are we justified? How are we made righteous? How are we declared righteous in God’s sight? As Paul says, it’s going to be through faith apart from works of the law. But what does that mean? Does that mean faith alone? Do our works matter? What role do they play in justification? That’s a long standing debate between Protestants and Catholics since the time of the Reformation.
But what’s interesting here is Paul uses the term justify to refer to what in context is his final judgment, or what theologians will call final justification. So there’s an initial justification that takes place at the beginning of life in Christ, where God declares a person righteous. Through faith and Baptism, they become a son of God. But there’s also a final justification, a final declaration of righteousness that takes place at the final judgment. And Paul here in context is obviously talking about that. So if you translate it literally, what he says is:
I do not even judge myself. I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby [justified]. It is the Lord who judges me. Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes… (1 Corinthians 4:3b-5a)
So you see, there’s your context...that the justification and the judgment that he’s talking about is the final judgment that will take place at the
parousia, at the second coming of Christ at the eschaton, the end of the age.
So what he’s doing here is he’s giving a little warning here. Only at the end of time, only at the final judgment will everything that is now hidden from human beings come to light when the Lord judges the hearts of each individual person. He’s the only one that has the omniscience—knowing all things, the power to know all things. God is the only one who has the omniscience necessary to even pass judgment on a human being.
So Paul gives us a salutary warning here against two tendencies. The first one is to judge other people, to pronounce a judgment—a verdict of whether another person is justified or not, whether they are saved or damned. It is imprudent and really irrational for any human being to pronounce in a definitive way that kind of judgment on another human being, because only God can judge the human heart.
The second thing he wants to guard against is pronouncing a judgment on ourselves, on our own souls. Paul says:
I am not aware of anything...but I am not thereby [justified]. It is the Lord who judges me.
I don’t get to be the judge of myself. Only at the final judgment will every person’s reward or punishment be doled out to that individual. Now the reason this particular text is, I think, very important in the context of contemporary Christianity—especially since the time of the Reformation—is that at the time of the Reformation, the idea began to spread among some of the Protestant reformers that a person who was in Christ, who was a believer who had been justified by faith, should be able to have absolute certainty that they were going to be saved. In fact, and if they didn’t have certainty, then that person could be declared as not yet being justified or not being saved.
This takes contemporary form in the very common question—if you’re a Catholic, especially if you’re living in Europe or the United States where there’s a heavy influence of churches that have come from the Protestant Reformation, you’ve probably been asked this question, “Are you saved?” Sometimes you’ll hear it phrased in this way, “If you die tonight, do you know for certain that you would go to Heaven?” And Catholics who are cradle Catholics (who have grown up in the Church) are often stumped by those kinds of questions or it gives them pause. They have to think about...well, wait, how do I answer that? Because the Church doesn’t talk about salvation in those specific terms, and those questions are really flowing out of a particular view of salvation that makes our justification in Christ contingent or dependent upon us having subjective certitude that if we died, we would go to Heaven and that we are saved.
So how does the Church respond to that kind of question? What does the Church teach about absolute assurance of salvation? How does she interpret Paul’s words here in 1 Corinthians 4? In order to answer that question, I’ve given you a quote here. This is from the Council of Trent, the
Decree on Justification that was promulgated by the Catholic Church in the mid 1500s, the year 1546. A very important, very famous decree where the Catholic Church—it’s long, too, and detailed—gives an explicitly biblical description of how we understand the process of salvation and justification, the relationship between faith and works. And in that
Decree on Justification, the Council of Trent says this about the whole idea of absolute assurance of salvation and also how to interpret Paul’s words in the readings for today.
For full access subscribe here >