Free US Shipping On Orders Over $99
Free US Shipping On Orders Over$99
All content (video, audio, and .pdf files) copyright © Catholic Productions, LLC. All rights reserved. Click here for details.

The Solemnity of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ, Year C

Gospel, First Reading & Psalm


Second Reading


***Subscribe or Login for Full Access.***

GOSPEL, FIRST READING & PSALM TRANSCRIPT (Subscribe or Login for Full Transcript):

A second great solemnity in Ordinary Time is the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ, commonly called Corpus Christi or The Body of Christ Sunday. On this day the Church commemorates the great gift of the Eucharist; the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ that was given to us for the first time at the Last Supper, and then is given to us every time the mass is celebrated throughout the world.

So today’s gospel is going to be taken from the Gospel of Luke because it is Year C, however, somewhat surprisingly, you might think, “oh, well, Corpus Christi, we should look at the Last Supper”. The Church doesn’t do that; it actually goes back to the public ministry of Jesus, and we look at the feeding of the five thousand, at Luke’s account of that. So let’s walk through that passage together, we’ll unpack it and then we’ll go back to the Old Testament, see how they relate to one another, and how all of this ties to the Eucharist, which Vatican II called the source and the summit of the Christian life. So, Luke 9:11-17 says this:

When the crowds learned it, they followed him; and he welcomed them and spoke to them of the kingdom of God, and cured those who had need of healing. Now the day began to wear away; and the twelve came and said to him, “Send the crowd away, to go into the villages and country round about, to lodge and get provisions; for we are here in a lonely place.” But he said to them, “You give them something to eat.” They said, “We have no more than five loaves and two fish—unless we are to go and buy food for all these people.” For there were about five thousand men. And he said to his disciples, “Make them sit down in companies, about fifty each.”  And they did so, and made them all sit down. And taking the five loaves and the two fish he looked up to heaven, and blessed and broke them, and gave them to the disciples to set before the crowd. And all ate and were satisfied. And they took up what was left over, twelve baskets of broken pieces.

Okay, so a few things first. The feeding of the five thousand; you’ve heard this one before because it’s the one miracle of Jesus that’s recorded in all four gospels. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John all testify to this magnificent miracle that Jesus performs of feeding five thousand people from five loaves and two fish. In one of my other lectures on this video I actually walk through how this is indeed a miracle (it’s not a miracle of sharing), it’s a miracle of multiplication, especially in John’s account which makes very clear that the food that the people eat is derived from the five loaves and the two fish. The twelve baskets that are filled up after (this is in John) come from those original elements. So I’m not going to go into that today, just suffice it to say here that no matter how tiny you break the pieces up into, you can’t get enough bread and fish to feed five thousand people from five loaves and two fish unless there is a miracle of multiplication. So that’s what’s taking place here.

Another aspect you might notice as you’re reading through it is that in Luke’s account — it’s very similar to the other accounts — you have the five thousand people, you have the five loaves and two fish, but there are some distinctive elements that are worth highlighting here. Number 1, first, Luke emphasizes that it takes place in a lonely place. Now that’s the Revised Standard Version’s translation. The Greek word there is actually erēmos, which can also be translated as “a deserted place”, or it’s actually just the word for a desert, meaning the wilderness. So, for example, when Jesus goes out into the desert to be tempted by the devil for forty days and forty nights, the Greek word there is the same word, erēmos. If you’re a 1st Century Jew and you’re reading this account, or you’re hearing about Jesus doing this miracle in the erēmos, in the desert or in the wilderness, it’s going to echo or call to mind for you the wilderness wandering in the desert at the time of the exodus from Egypt. So the setting of the feeding of the five thousand in the wilderness is itself already your first clue that this miracle is pointing back to the exodus from Egypt, and it doesn’t take a biblical scholar to know that in the exodus from Egypt, one of the great miracles was the miraculous feeding of the twelve tribes of Israel through the gift of the manna from heaven, this miraculous bread from heaven.

So what we have here in the feeding of the five thousand, just the very setting itself, in a lonely place (or in a desert), is an echo of the miracle of the manna. Which is, by the way, another reason for showing that this isn’t a miracle of sharing, because the miracle of the manna in the Old Testament didn’t have anything to do with sharing, it had to do with God miraculously and supernaturally supplying his people with food while they were in the wilderness so that they could journey to the Promised Land. So if the feeding of the five thousand is a recapitulation of the manna, if Jesus is like a new Moses in a new wilderness feeding the new Israel, then it wouldn’t make any sense for the first one to be miraculous, but this new and greater feeding to be a simple, natural act of sharing. It’s a preposterous suggestion, there’s no biblical foundation for it in the text, and it just (basically) is groundless. It has no basis in the text, or (and frankly) in the tradition too, it was made up about 150 years ago by a German rationalist who didn’t believe in miracles. So he tried to come up with some other way to explain the text. Here, what we see is, an echo of the exodus from Egypt.

A second element here has to do with something that is common to Luke and the other gospels, namely, the five loaves and the two fish. So there’s a dramatic difference between the amount of food they have and the number of people that need to be fed. I mean, if you’ve ever given a party for fifty people at your house, you know how much food fifty people can eat. So, this is five thousand people, and all they have is five loaves and two fish. So it’s going to take a miracle to feed them. Now, a third element of Luke’s account that really is striking is the fact that Jesus makes them sit down in companies of about fifty each. That’s something I know for me, I blew right past year after year of reading the text. I never really noticed that. But if you pause and think about it for a second in real time, when the Apostles asked Jesus what are we going to do, and Jesus says you give them something to eat, and the Apostles say, “are we going to go buy food for them? That’s not possible.” What does Jesus command them do? He tells the twelve, “make them all sit down in companies of fifty each”. Now, how long would that take? How long would that take the twelve disciples to get five thousand people to sit down in companies of fifty each? I mean, as a professor, it’s hard sometimes to get thirty-five people to sit down and be quiet so we can start the class. So you know it can be difficult to bring a group to order and to make them all calm down and sit down, much less to arrange them in groups of fifty each.

So why does Jesus do that? It’s a little weird. Why doesn’t he just multiply the loaves and the fish like in the movies? He always does that in the movies. In the movies, they never show the Apostles going around “Ok, now, fifty of you here, and fifty here” — what’s going on? Well I’ll never forget, one day I was reading the Dead Sea Scrolls and there’s a famous Dead Sea Scroll called the Damascus Document. The Dead Sea Scrolls were these ancient Hebrew writings from the time of Jesus that describe the beliefs of a Jewish group, probably, most likely, identified as the Essenes. And one of the things the Damascus Document does is it’s looking forward to the time of the Messiah as like a new exodus — “When a prophet will arise like Moses…”, and there will be events that parallel the exodus from Egypt. In that document (in chapter 12) it describes how in the time of the Messiah, the new Israel, the people of Israel, are going to sit down in companies of fifty and a hundred, and things like that. And I thought, “oh wow”, it reminded me of the feeding of the five thousand, which brought me back to the book of Exodus, because in the book of Exodus 18, there’s an image of “the twelve tribes being arranged into specific groups of fifty.” It is actually a biblical image. So why does Jesus make the Apostles do this thing that would have taken time and effort? Well it’s because he is arranging the people at the feeding of the five thousand according to the same kind of groupings that you’d find in the first exodus from Egypt. Listen to the words of Exodus 18:25-26, it says this:

Moses chose able men out of all Israel…

That means all twelve tribes

…and made them heads over the people, rulers of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and tens. And those men, they judged the people at all times

That’s Exodus 18:25-26. So what Moses is describing here is not an exact parallel with Jesus but it’s significant. It’s Moses basically choosing what were called phylarchs, these men who (kind of) rule over the different tribes and judge them. And they are divided up into thousands, hundreds, and fifties, and tens. Now that division of the people of the twelve tribes of Israel underneath these twelve judges, these twelve phylarchs, it’s picked up, and in Jewish tradition, by the time you get to the 1st Century, the idea of twelve judges organizing the people of Israel into different groups (the one that gets highlighted in the Dead Sea Scrolls is groups of fifty), becomes a kind of image associated with the (so-to-speak) the hierarchy (or the organizational structure) of the Exodus from Egypt. So when Jesus does something similar with his Apostles, he takes twelve men and appoints them to arrange the people (the five thousand men) into groups of fifty each…One scholar pointed this out that it’s kind of a military exercise as well. Setting people up into divisions, so to speak, according to numerical units. What’s he doing? He’s implicitly revealing his identity as the new Moses. The twelve Apostles are like the new twelve judges, and then the people (the five thousand people) are like a new Israel, because this is the new Exodus. He’s revealing through this sign that the new exodus is at hand.

SECOND READING TRANSCRIPT (Subscribe or Login for Full Transcript):

Before we get into the issue of tradition, just on the level of the literal sense of this text in its original context, a few observations that I want to highlight. First, unlike the accounts of the Last Supper in the gospels, like Matthew, Mark and Luke, the words of institution, Paul's very explicit here that what he's about to tell the Corinthians is something that he's received from someone else. So that's what he means when he says:

I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you…

We're going to come back to that in just a minute. Second, notice that Paul gives us here the words of institution, but he has something that's actually distinctive about his account. When he's speaking about the cup of the new covenant, he has a clause that he adds in there:

“Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”

Now in the ancient Church, that clause as often as you drink it actually became a scriptural foundation for the practice of receiving communion under one kind. Because wine was not as readily available in all places as it is to us nowadays, although the Eucharist would be celebrated with bread and wine, it was not the case that there was enough wine to communicate that or to give the chalice or the cup to everyone participating in it. And so the custom rose fairly early on of reception under one kind, where the faithful would just receive the body of Christ and not drink of the blood of Christ, although the celebrant, the priest, would partake of both, the custom rose of the faithful just partaking of one.

There are lots of theological reasons and arguments about that. The Council of Trent actually would eventually have to go on and dogmatically define that whether you receive under one kind or under both kinds, it doesn't matter. You always receive the whole Christ, the totus Christus, the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus, whether it's under the appearance of bread or under the appearance of wine. But what was interesting is that this particular verse, “as often as you drink it,” was interpreted as implying that sometimes you would drink it and sometimes you would not. This gave a kind of basic foundation for the idea, or the practice I should say, of reception under one kind. That's the second point.

Then the third point about this in its original context that is fascinating is the last line where Paul says:

For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

Now the Greek word there, katangelō, just means to proclaim, but a number of scholars have pointed out that the Hebrew synonym for that word, haggadah, to proclaim or proclamation, is the name of the Passover rite or the Passover ritual that would later develop in ancient Judaism and continues to this day. So sometimes we will talk about, in contemporary context, a Passover seder meal. That's very common. Seder means order. So it's the order of the service that will be celebrated at a Jewish Passover. But when you actually get to a Jewish Passover, the description of the ritual is frequently called the Passover Haggadah, which literally means the Passover proclamation. It has specific reference to the proclamation of certain scriptural texts associated with the Passover from the Old Testament.

So scholars have suggested that when Paul is writing this letter to the church at Corinth, when he says “for as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes”, that he's actually drawing there on the language of the Jewish Passover, that just as the Jews proclaimed the Haggadah, the proclamation, of what God had done at the time of the Exodus and how he was saving them through the sacrifice of the Passover lamb and through the deliverance under Moses, so too now, those who are in Christ are proclaiming the way God delivers them from sin and from death, namely through the death of the Lord who is the true Passover lamb.

In support of that suggestion, if you go back to 1 Corinthians 5:7, Paul says:

For Christ, our [passover]…

that’s the Greek word for pascha

…paschal lamb, has been sacrificed.  Let us, therefore, celebrate the festival,

or "keep the feast," more literally. So what feast is Paul talking about when he says, "Let us keep the feast"? Well, some people think he means the Passover feast of the Jewish people, but in context, it's more likely that he's referring to the Eucharistic feast, and that he's taking the terminology of Passover and applying it to the Lord's Supper. He's saying, "because Christ, our Passover, has been sacrificed, let us keep the feast of the Lord's supper," the feast of the Eucharist.

All right. So that's just a basic little overview of what he's getting at in this particular passage. Oh, by the way, and he says, "You proclaim it until he comes." So that's another aspect. He connects the Lord's Supper with the second coming of Christ. It's an anticipation. It's awaiting the coming of Jesus at the final judgment, which is also like the Jewish Passover, because by the time of Paul in the first century AD, a tradition had arisen that the Messiah would come on Passover night and that he would return at the time of the Passover. So just as the Jews celebrated their Passover meals in partial anticipation of the coming Messiah, so now Paul's telling the Corinthians, whenever you celebrate the Eucharist, the Lord's Supper, you're proclaiming the Lord's death until he comes in the second coming of the Messiah at the end of the time.

With all that said, what about the relationship between Eucharist and Tradition? Well, one aspect of Paul's account of the Last Supper that's very significant and it's unique to his account is the link between the Eucharist and Tradition. Now you can't see it clearly in your English translation...

For full access subscribe here >

 



Gospel, First Reading & Psalm


Second Reading


***Subscribe or Login for Full Access.***

GOSPEL, FIRST READING & PSALM TRANSCRIPT (Subscribe or Login for Full Transcript):

A second great solemnity in Ordinary Time is the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ, commonly called Corpus Christi or The Body of Christ Sunday. On this day the Church commemorates the great gift of the Eucharist; the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ that was given to us for the first time at the Last Supper, and then is given to us every time the mass is celebrated throughout the world.

So today’s gospel is going to be taken from the Gospel of Luke because it is Year C, however, somewhat surprisingly, you might think, “oh, well, Corpus Christi, we should look at the Last Supper”. The Church doesn’t do that; it actually goes back to the public ministry of Jesus, and we look at the feeding of the five thousand, at Luke’s account of that. So let’s walk through that passage together, we’ll unpack it and then we’ll go back to the Old Testament, see how they relate to one another, and how all of this ties to the Eucharist, which Vatican II called the source and the summit of the Christian life. So, Luke 9:11-17 says this:

When the crowds learned it, they followed him; and he welcomed them and spoke to them of the kingdom of God, and cured those who had need of healing. Now the day began to wear away; and the twelve came and said to him, “Send the crowd away, to go into the villages and country round about, to lodge and get provisions; for we are here in a lonely place.” But he said to them, “You give them something to eat.” They said, “We have no more than five loaves and two fish—unless we are to go and buy food for all these people.” For there were about five thousand men. And he said to his disciples, “Make them sit down in companies, about fifty each.”  And they did so, and made them all sit down. And taking the five loaves and the two fish he looked up to heaven, and blessed and broke them, and gave them to the disciples to set before the crowd. And all ate and were satisfied. And they took up what was left over, twelve baskets of broken pieces.

Okay, so a few things first. The feeding of the five thousand; you’ve heard this one before because it’s the one miracle of Jesus that’s recorded in all four gospels. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John all testify to this magnificent miracle that Jesus performs of feeding five thousand people from five loaves and two fish. In one of my other lectures on this video I actually walk through how this is indeed a miracle (it’s not a miracle of sharing), it’s a miracle of multiplication, especially in John’s account which makes very clear that the food that the people eat is derived from the five loaves and the two fish. The twelve baskets that are filled up after (this is in John) come from those original elements. So I’m not going to go into that today, just suffice it to say here that no matter how tiny you break the pieces up into, you can’t get enough bread and fish to feed five thousand people from five loaves and two fish unless there is a miracle of multiplication. So that’s what’s taking place here.

Another aspect you might notice as you’re reading through it is that in Luke’s account — it’s very similar to the other accounts — you have the five thousand people, you have the five loaves and two fish, but there are some distinctive elements that are worth highlighting here. Number 1, first, Luke emphasizes that it takes place in a lonely place. Now that’s the Revised Standard Version’s translation. The Greek word there is actually erēmos, which can also be translated as “a deserted place”, or it’s actually just the word for a desert, meaning the wilderness. So, for example, when Jesus goes out into the desert to be tempted by the devil for forty days and forty nights, the Greek word there is the same word, erēmos. If you’re a 1st Century Jew and you’re reading this account, or you’re hearing about Jesus doing this miracle in the erēmos, in the desert or in the wilderness, it’s going to echo or call to mind for you the wilderness wandering in the desert at the time of the exodus from Egypt. So the setting of the feeding of the five thousand in the wilderness is itself already your first clue that this miracle is pointing back to the exodus from Egypt, and it doesn’t take a biblical scholar to know that in the exodus from Egypt, one of the great miracles was the miraculous feeding of the twelve tribes of Israel through the gift of the manna from heaven, this miraculous bread from heaven.

So what we have here in the feeding of the five thousand, just the very setting itself, in a lonely place (or in a desert), is an echo of the miracle of the manna. Which is, by the way, another reason for showing that this isn’t a miracle of sharing, because the miracle of the manna in the Old Testament didn’t have anything to do with sharing, it had to do with God miraculously and supernaturally supplying his people with food while they were in the wilderness so that they could journey to the Promised Land. So if the feeding of the five thousand is a recapitulation of the manna, if Jesus is like a new Moses in a new wilderness feeding the new Israel, then it wouldn’t make any sense for the first one to be miraculous, but this new and greater feeding to be a simple, natural act of sharing. It’s a preposterous suggestion, there’s no biblical foundation for it in the text, and it just (basically) is groundless. It has no basis in the text, or (and frankly) in the tradition too, it was made up about 150 years ago by a German rationalist who didn’t believe in miracles. So he tried to come up with some other way to explain the text. Here, what we see is, an echo of the exodus from Egypt.

A second element here has to do with something that is common to Luke and the other gospels, namely, the five loaves and the two fish. So there’s a dramatic difference between the amount of food they have and the number of people that need to be fed. I mean, if you’ve ever given a party for fifty people at your house, you know how much food fifty people can eat. So, this is five thousand people, and all they have is five loaves and two fish. So it’s going to take a miracle to feed them. Now, a third element of Luke’s account that really is striking is the fact that Jesus makes them sit down in companies of about fifty each. That’s something I know for me, I blew right past year after year of reading the text. I never really noticed that. But if you pause and think about it for a second in real time, when the Apostles asked Jesus what are we going to do, and Jesus says you give them something to eat, and the Apostles say, “are we going to go buy food for them? That’s not possible.” What does Jesus command them do? He tells the twelve, “make them all sit down in companies of fifty each”. Now, how long would that take? How long would that take the twelve disciples to get five thousand people to sit down in companies of fifty each? I mean, as a professor, it’s hard sometimes to get thirty-five people to sit down and be quiet so we can start the class. So you know it can be difficult to bring a group to order and to make them all calm down and sit down, much less to arrange them in groups of fifty each.

So why does Jesus do that? It’s a little weird. Why doesn’t he just multiply the loaves and the fish like in the movies? He always does that in the movies. In the movies, they never show the Apostles going around “Ok, now, fifty of you here, and fifty here” — what’s going on? Well I’ll never forget, one day I was reading the Dead Sea Scrolls and there’s a famous Dead Sea Scroll called the Damascus Document. The Dead Sea Scrolls were these ancient Hebrew writings from the time of Jesus that describe the beliefs of a Jewish group, probably, most likely, identified as the Essenes. And one of the things the Damascus Document does is it’s looking forward to the time of the Messiah as like a new exodus — “When a prophet will arise like Moses…”, and there will be events that parallel the exodus from Egypt. In that document (in chapter 12) it describes how in the time of the Messiah, the new Israel, the people of Israel, are going to sit down in companies of fifty and a hundred, and things like that. And I thought, “oh wow”, it reminded me of the feeding of the five thousand, which brought me back to the book of Exodus, because in the book of Exodus 18, there’s an image of “the twelve tribes being arranged into specific groups of fifty.” It is actually a biblical image. So why does Jesus make the Apostles do this thing that would have taken time and effort? Well it’s because he is arranging the people at the feeding of the five thousand according to the same kind of groupings that you’d find in the first exodus from Egypt. Listen to the words of Exodus 18:25-26, it says this:

Moses chose able men out of all Israel…

That means all twelve tribes

…and made them heads over the people, rulers of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and tens. And those men, they judged the people at all times

That’s Exodus 18:25-26. So what Moses is describing here is not an exact parallel with Jesus but it’s significant. It’s Moses basically choosing what were called phylarchs, these men who (kind of) rule over the different tribes and judge them. And they are divided up into thousands, hundreds, and fifties, and tens. Now that division of the people of the twelve tribes of Israel underneath these twelve judges, these twelve phylarchs, it’s picked up, and in Jewish tradition, by the time you get to the 1st Century, the idea of twelve judges organizing the people of Israel into different groups (the one that gets highlighted in the Dead Sea Scrolls is groups of fifty), becomes a kind of image associated with the (so-to-speak) the hierarchy (or the organizational structure) of the Exodus from Egypt. So when Jesus does something similar with his Apostles, he takes twelve men and appoints them to arrange the people (the five thousand men) into groups of fifty each…One scholar pointed this out that it’s kind of a military exercise as well. Setting people up into divisions, so to speak, according to numerical units. What’s he doing? He’s implicitly revealing his identity as the new Moses. The twelve Apostles are like the new twelve judges, and then the people (the five thousand people) are like a new Israel, because this is the new Exodus. He’s revealing through this sign that the new exodus is at hand.

SECOND READING TRANSCRIPT (Subscribe or Login for Full Transcript):

Before we get into the issue of tradition, just on the level of the literal sense of this text in its original context, a few observations that I want to highlight. First, unlike the accounts of the Last Supper in the gospels, like Matthew, Mark and Luke, the words of institution, Paul's very explicit here that what he's about to tell the Corinthians is something that he's received from someone else. So that's what he means when he says:

I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you…

We're going to come back to that in just a minute. Second, notice that Paul gives us here the words of institution, but he has something that's actually distinctive about his account. When he's speaking about the cup of the new covenant, he has a clause that he adds in there:

“Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”

Now in the ancient Church, that clause as often as you drink it actually became a scriptural foundation for the practice of receiving communion under one kind. Because wine was not as readily available in all places as it is to us nowadays, although the Eucharist would be celebrated with bread and wine, it was not the case that there was enough wine to communicate that or to give the chalice or the cup to everyone participating in it. And so the custom rose fairly early on of reception under one kind, where the faithful would just receive the body of Christ and not drink of the blood of Christ, although the celebrant, the priest, would partake of both, the custom rose of the faithful just partaking of one.

There are lots of theological reasons and arguments about that. The Council of Trent actually would eventually have to go on and dogmatically define that whether you receive under one kind or under both kinds, it doesn't matter. You always receive the whole Christ, the totus Christus, the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus, whether it's under the appearance of bread or under the appearance of wine. But what was interesting is that this particular verse, “as often as you drink it,” was interpreted as implying that sometimes you would drink it and sometimes you would not. This gave a kind of basic foundation for the idea, or the practice I should say, of reception under one kind. That's the second point.

Then the third point about this in its original context that is fascinating is the last line where Paul says:

For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

Now the Greek word there, katangelō, just means to proclaim, but a number of scholars have pointed out that the Hebrew synonym for that word, haggadah, to proclaim or proclamation, is the name of the Passover rite or the Passover ritual that would later develop in ancient Judaism and continues to this day. So sometimes we will talk about, in contemporary context, a Passover seder meal. That's very common. Seder means order. So it's the order of the service that will be celebrated at a Jewish Passover. But when you actually get to a Jewish Passover, the description of the ritual is frequently called the Passover Haggadah, which literally means the Passover proclamation. It has specific reference to the proclamation of certain scriptural texts associated with the Passover from the Old Testament.

So scholars have suggested that when Paul is writing this letter to the church at Corinth, when he says “for as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes”, that he's actually drawing there on the language of the Jewish Passover, that just as the Jews proclaimed the Haggadah, the proclamation, of what God had done at the time of the Exodus and how he was saving them through the sacrifice of the Passover lamb and through the deliverance under Moses, so too now, those who are in Christ are proclaiming the way God delivers them from sin and from death, namely through the death of the Lord who is the true Passover lamb.

In support of that suggestion, if you go back to 1 Corinthians 5:7, Paul says:

For Christ, our [passover]…

that’s the Greek word for pascha

…paschal lamb, has been sacrificed.  Let us, therefore, celebrate the festival,

or "keep the feast," more literally. So what feast is Paul talking about when he says, "Let us keep the feast"? Well, some people think he means the Passover feast of the Jewish people, but in context, it's more likely that he's referring to the Eucharistic feast, and that he's taking the terminology of Passover and applying it to the Lord's Supper. He's saying, "because Christ, our Passover, has been sacrificed, let us keep the feast of the Lord's supper," the feast of the Eucharist.

All right. So that's just a basic little overview of what he's getting at in this particular passage. Oh, by the way, and he says, "You proclaim it until he comes." So that's another aspect. He connects the Lord's Supper with the second coming of Christ. It's an anticipation. It's awaiting the coming of Jesus at the final judgment, which is also like the Jewish Passover, because by the time of Paul in the first century AD, a tradition had arisen that the Messiah would come on Passover night and that he would return at the time of the Passover. So just as the Jews celebrated their Passover meals in partial anticipation of the coming Messiah, so now Paul's telling the Corinthians, whenever you celebrate the Eucharist, the Lord's Supper, you're proclaiming the Lord's death until he comes in the second coming of the Messiah at the end of the time.

With all that said, what about the relationship between Eucharist and Tradition? Well, one aspect of Paul's account of the Last Supper that's very significant and it's unique to his account is the link between the Eucharist and Tradition. Now you can't see it clearly in your English translation...

For full access subscribe here >

 



test text
★★★★★ Reviews

Letting Customers Speak for Us

4777 reviews
94%
(4475)
3%
(143)
1%
(58)
0%
(13)
2%
(88)
M
Wives Do What?!
Michael Arnold
Wives do what

Pitre never disappoints. His knowledge is unsurpassed by anyone

Insightful Course.

Good insights that challenged my view of life after death in Catholic teaching.

Dr. Pitre’s Best Book Yet

The content was clear, organized and so well done! You can read it all in one sitting from cover to cover OR in sections! I am so grateful for Dr. Pitre. A must read!

Brant Pitre for the win

I needed background on the development of the canon of Scripture as part of a lecture. Honestly, Brant Pitre is my current theology crush. With so much knowledge to share and a great sense of humor, he wins the day again for me.

Enthusiastically viewed

I bought this to show after Wednesday’s Mass in our parish hall to a group of about 15 seniors. We did one dvd a week, I printed out the sections of the outline for that disc for each attendee. I have a permanent audience now and have purchased several more that have been eagerly received. We are learning so much of the ancient origins of our faith that until this point were mostly in the shadows. Dr Pitri validates our long held beliefs with his biblical background of the role St Jiseph played in the lives of Jesus and Mary.